運動降低乳癌致死率(9%: ER-/ 50% ER+) !!

Exercise Alterations of the Host–Tumor Interaction ASCO MAY 31, 2015 Dr. Lee W. Jones Lee W. Jones, PhD The putative benefits of regular exercise on both the primary and secondary prevention of major chronic conditions such as heart disease, stroke, and type II diabetes are established. As a result, recommendations to increase regular exercise are viewed as being of equal importance in the prevention and treatment of the most common chronic diseases as smoking cessation, maintaining a body mass index (BMI) of less than 25 kg/m2, and consuming a balanced diet.1 

Role of Exercise in Cancer Prevention and Prognosis  In contrast, the notion that exercise may prevent the incidence of certain forms of cancer has not gained the same level of clinical acceptance. The underlying reasons for these differences are not clear; however, there is convincing observational evidence that participation in regular exercise is associated with a 30%-50% reduction in the primary incidence of colon and breast cancers, as well as a 10%-30% reduction in the risk of other common cancers, such as prostate and lung cancers.2 Similarly, researchers have only recently begun investigating whether modifiable host factors influencing energy balance, such as body size, diet, and physical activity and exercise, are associated with cancer outcomes post-diagnosis.3,4 Regarding the latter, several observational studies suggest that, in general, regular exercise is associated with a 10%-50% reduction in the risk of recurrence, as well as cancer-specific death, even after adjustment for confounding factors, such as BMI, age, and adjuvant therapy.5,6 The majority of work has been performed in early-stage breast cancer, but initial evidence also exists in early colorectal, prostate, and ovarian cancers.5,6 Together, these data have led to a growing consensus that exercise exposure after a cancer diagnosis may alter cancer outcomes, fueling calls to action for confirmatory phase III randomized trials.4,7 Indeed, at least one such trial is ongoing. The Colon Health and Life-Long Exercise Change (CHALLENGE) trial is a phase III trial investigating the effects of regular exercise on recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in patients with postoperative colorectal cancer.8 The results of this trial are eagerly anticipated and will provide new insights into the efficacy of exercise to alter the clinical course of disease progression. In conjunction with such efforts, similar to the development of new anticancer agents, a thorough understanding of the biological properties and identification of the optimal dose, as well as predictive biomarkers to inform patient selection, will optimize the therapeutic benefit of exercise as adjuvant therapy. The following is a brief overview of emerging data in this area. 

Key Points  There is emerging evidence that compared to inactivity, higher levels of exercise following diagnosis may be associated with improvements in cancer outcomes in patients with operable breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. Exercise may alter the events underlying cancer initiation and/or progression via the modulation of circulating growth factors and other cell phenotypes representing metabolic, sex-steroid, immune-inflammatory, and oxidative pathways that comprise the systemic host milieu. Tumor response to exercise treatment will likely be highly contingent on the tumor molecular landscape, similar to therapeutic response to pharmacologic anticancer agents. 

Biology of Exercise  Exercise is planned activity requiring the sustained activation of skeletal muscle with the objective of improving health or fitness. Adenosine triphosphate is required to maintain muscular work in response to exercise, resulting in the mobilization and breakdown of intramuscular and extramuscular substrates (e.g., carbohydrates and fat) in combination with the delivery of oxygen (from the atmosphere via the organ components of oxygen transport) to match the muscle metabolic requirements during prolonged exercise.9 The complex, coordinated multi-organ response that controls and regulates the physiological response to exercise has been summarized by several excellent reviews.10-12 In brief, repeated muscle contraction in response to chronic, repeated exercise stimuli leads to the activation of a multitude of gene-expression pathways promoting several local adaptive physiological responses. Intriguingly, these local physiologic adaptations may represent primary events that, in turn, initiate a complex cascade of subsequent local and systemic events that profoundly modulate whole-body (host) physiology and host milieu. 

Exercise Modulation of the Systemic (Host) Milieu: Is Muscle a Key Link?  The prevailing model is that exercise may alter the events underlying cancer initiation and/or progression via the modulation of circulating growth factors and other cell phenotypes representing metabolic, sex-steroid, immune- inflammatory, and oxidative pathways that comprise the systemic host milieu.13 In this realm, most research to date has focused on the role of exercise in modulating circulating metabolic factors. Skeletal muscle is the major tissue responsible for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and fat oxidation and accounts for approximately 80% of glucose disposal under insulin-stimulated conditions; exercise can increase glucose uptake 20-100–fold in the muscle via insulin-independent mechanisms.14 Consequently, increased exercise-induced glucose disposal is critical to maintaining normal whole-body metabolic homeostasis, but it also improves metabolic control among individuals with abnormal glucose control.15  In cancer, elevated circulating levels of glucose, insulin, and insulin-like growth factors are associated with a higher primary risk of certain forms of cancer, as well as poorer prognosis after a cancer diagnosis.16 As such, the well-established ability of chronic exercise, particularly endurance training, to favorably modulate the metabolic profile in the peripheral circulation is likely an important mechanism underlying the exercise–cancer relationship. Unfortunately, this hypothesis has not been directly tested, and the limited number of clinical studies examining the effects of exercise on changes in circulating metabolic factors in patients with or at risk of cancer are mixed.5  Surprisingly little is known about the effects and molecular mechanisms of exercise-induced regulation of the other cancer-implicated host pathways.17 Such effects are likely governed by a highly integrative, complex cascade of signaling events involving numerous positive and negative reciprocal feedback loops between numerous organ systems, orchestrated via instructive signals delivered in the host bloodstream.  Primary events instigated in the skeletal muscle action may again play a critical mediating role in this process. For example, recent discoveries indicate that in response to chronic exercise, skeletal muscle operates as an endocrine organ, secreting various factors both locally and into the host circulation. In this way, skeletal muscle exerts endocrine and autocrine effects within other organs, including the brain, liver, bone marrow, pancreas, and adipose tissue (i.e., muscle-organ crosstalk).18 Such effects not only likely influence the release of factors from these distant organs, thus altering the nature and concentration of circulating factors in the systemic milieu, but also may directly modify the tissue microenvironment (niche) of these organs. This latter effect could play a role in recurrence because distant organs that may engage in crosstalk with muscles could harbor disseminated cancer cells; exercise-induced changes in the systemic milieu could, in turn, alter ligand availability in distant organ (metastatic) niches to potentially affect escape from dormancy19 and/or progression of overt metastases. Although potentially exciting, such a concept remains pure speculation at present and one that will require transdisciplinary research efforts to address. 

Are Tumor Subtypes Important?  Research investigating the mechanisms by which exercise may prevent primary or secondary cancer incidence has, to date, focused exclusively on modulation of circulating factors in the peripheral (host) circulation. As an extension, it seems biologically plausible that tumor cell response, and/or response of cells in the tumor microenvironment to exercise-induced changes in host factors, will also vary dramatically based on the tumor molecular profile. A small number of initial studies have investigated whether tumor molecular features modulate the exercise response.  For example, Holmes et al. found regular exercise (i.e., approximately 150 minutes of moderate-intensity endurance exercise per week) was associated with a relative risk reduction in breast cancer death of only 9% in women with estrogen receptor–negative tumors relative to a 50% reduction in women with estrogen receptor–positive tumors.20 This finding was corroborated by Irwin et al.21 In a detailed analysis of tumor samples obtained at the time of surgical resection, Morikawa et al. found that patients who reported a level of exercise greater than or equal to 18 metabolic equivalent task–hours per week,1 whose tumors did not express CTNNB1 (b-catenin)—a key mediator of the WNT signaling pathway that plays an important role in colorectal carcinogenesis—had an adjusted hazard ratio for colorectal cancer–specific survival of 0.33 (95% CI [0.13, 0.81]) compared with patients reporting less than 18 metabolic equivalent task–hours per week.1,22 Conversely, there was no significant relationship between exercise and prognosis in patients with tumors that were positive for nuclear CTNNB1 (adjusted hazard ratio 1.07; 95% CI [0.50, 2.30]). These initial findings indicate that, perhaps unsurprisingly, tumor response to exercise will likely be highly contingent on the tumor molecular landscape, similar to therapeutic response to pharmacologic anticancer agents.  Over the past decade, the safety and benefits of exercise as an effective adjunct therapy to offset the acute and late-occurring effects of adjuvant therapy has gained increasing recognition and acceptance.23 It is now clear that a parallel line of research investigating the efficacy of exercise as primary treatment for cancer is also gaining considerable momentum. In this context, exercise may represent a promising strategy with a largely unique ability to simultaneously modulate multiple host-related pathways, and potentially therefore, modulate the host–tumor interaction. Future efforts adopting translational approaches in an attempt to disentangle the complex multifaceted interactions between exercise-induced physiological responses, the host milieu, and cancer phenotypes pose a substantial challenge but one that could produce significant dividends in the long run. 

About the Author: Dr. Jones is a researcher at Memorial Sloan Kettering CancerCenter. He has been an ASCO member for 10 years and currently serves on the Cardiac Toxicity and Survivorship committees. 

References:  

Eyre H, Kahn R, Robertson RM, et al. Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:190-207.

Friedenreich CM, Orenstein MR. Physical activity and cancer prevention: etiologic evidence and biological mechanisms. J Nutr. 2002;132:3456S-3464S. Goodwin PJ, Meyerhardt JA, Hursting SD. Host factors and cancer outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4019-4021.

Ligibel JA, Alfano CM, Courneya KS, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology position statement on obesity and cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3568-3574.

Betof AS, Dewhirst MW, Jones LW. Effects and potential mechanisms of exercise training on cancer progression: a translational perspective. Brain Behav Immun. 2013;30:SupplS75-S87.

 Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, et al. Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:815-840.

Ballard-Barbash R, Hunsberger S, Alciati MH, et al. Physical activity, weight control, and breast cancer risk and survival: clinical trial rationale and design considerations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:630-643.

 Courneya KS, Booth CM, Gill S, et al. The Colon Health and Life-Long Exercise Change trial: a randomized trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Curr Oncol. 2008;15:279-285.

Jones LW, Eves ND, Haykowsky M, et al. Exercise intolerance in cancer and the role of exercise therapy to reverse dysfunction. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:598-605.

Hawley JA, Hargreaves M, Joyner MJ, et al. Integrative biology of exercise. Cell. 2014;159:738-749.

Jones NL, Killian KJ. Exercise limitation in health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:632-641.

Coffey VG, Hawley JA. The molecular bases of training adaptation. Sports Med. 2007;37:737-763.

McTiernan A. Mechanisms linking physical activity with cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:205-211.

Goodyear LJ, Kahn BB. Exercise, glucose transport, and insulin sensitivity. Annu Rev Med. 1998;49:235-261.

Stanford KI, Goodyear LJ. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: molecular mechanisms regulating glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. Adv Physiol Educ. 2014;38:308-314.

Pollak M. The insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: an update. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:159-169.

 Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. The role of exercise and PGC1alpha in inflammation and chronic disease. Nature. 2008;454:463-469.

Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA. Muscles, exercise and obesity: skeletal muscle as a secretory organ. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8:457-465.

Jones LW, Antonelli J, Masko EM, et al. Exercise modulation of the host-tumor interaction in an orthotopic model of murine prostate cancer. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012;113:263-272.

Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, et al. Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA. 2005;293:2479-2486.

 Irwin ML, Smith AW, McTiernan A, et al. Influence of pre- and postdiagnosis physical activity on mortality in breast cancer survivors: the health, eating, activity, and lifestyle study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3958-3964.

Morikawa T, Kuchiba A, Yamauchi M, et al. Association of CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) alterations, body mass index, and physical activity with survival in patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2011;305:1685-1694.

Jones LW, Alfano CM. Exercise-oncology research: past, present, and future. Acta Oncol. 2015;52: 195-215.

Straussman R, Morikawa T, Shee K, et al. Tumour micro-environment elicits innate resistance to RAF inhibitors through HGF secretion. Nature. 2012;487:500-504.